Linguistics is a subject which came to the fore only in the 1960s. It is founded on a fallacy.
Linguistics claims to be “the scientific study of language”, but language behaviour is too open-ended and creative to be treated by the methods of science. In consequence, linguistic theories systematically distort the nature of language, and present a misleading picture of our human nature.
This book shows how various traditions of linguistics, and their accounts of different aspects of language, are all infected by the delusion of scientism. And it offers positive examples of how language can be studied insightfully, once the scientistic delusion is given up.
To whet your appetite, I have placed a copy of the introductory chapter on the Web.
Some critical comment:
- … argues that linguistics is not and cannot be a scientific study of language, because language is too creative … This book is a weighty read … linguistics [according to Sampson] perhaps should not ‘rank as a “subject” at all’ as a coherent body of knowledge taught in universities. He acknowledges that linguists will likely find these claims extremely contentious … I am sympathetic to Sampson’s claim
- — Shiloh Drake, in the Journal of Linguistics
2 Two Ideas of Creativity
3 Grammaticality Meets Real-Life Usage
4 Rigid Strings and Flaky Snowflakes
5 Economic Growth and Linguistic Theory
6 The “Cognitive” Alternative
7 One Man’s Norm is Another’s Metaphor
8 From Phonemic Spelling to Distinctive Spelling
9 The Reality of Compound Ideographs
10 A Linguistic Axiom Challenged
11 Complexity in Language and in Law
And Now for Something Completely Different…
12 A Phonological Paradox
13 How Many Possible Trade Names Are There?
The Linguistics Delusion is published by Equinox, of Sheffield and Connecticut. Paper copies are available via relevant British or American Amazon pages; for the e-book see the link below.
ISBN 978-1-78179-577-4 (hardback)
ISBN 978-1-78179-606-1 (e-book)
ISBN 978-1-78179-578-1 (paperback)
last changed 16 Aug 2019